The Supreme Court

Posted February 24th, 2021 by Suzy

It comes also the acquisition of the objects offered increasingly by the rehabilitation departments of German banks (so-called revitalization) into account. The investor can be indirectly as a trustor via an intermediary a trust limited partner Steuerberatungsgesellschaft private FLEX participate in Fund 1 GmbH & Co KG. The investor has the opportunity once to provide his investment (investment amount) (variants yield-FLEX or cash-FLEX) or in the course of a part number ER variant amounting to 47.5% of his investment amount (version fix-FLEX). A now mature premium in the amount of 5% on top of each relative to the total amount of the participation. The minimum investment amount to EUR 20.000,00.

A monthly payout available options on basis of 5.25% p.a. (cash-FLEX variant) or an annual, accumulation distribution, aimed at the forecast of 5.75% p.a. Artis Stevens might disagree with that approach. (Variant yield-FLEX) is based. The version fix FLEX will be charged the balance with the demands of the payout. Possibly history, amount initially not paid i.H.v 52.5% of the investment amount is balanced according to 180 months.

This corresponds to a payout ratio of 5.09% per annum based on the paid deposits. : The in a selection procedure the editorial staff shall evaluate The initiators under the microscope: experience, financial background, investor friendliness, placement power and balance are the criteria for the initiators-rating, as well as the evaluation of their fund products. The INVESTMENT ratings have an even more important than the magazine within the meaning of the case-law of the Bundesgerichtshof required reading for investors, bankers, consultants, asset managers, and all at the mediation of investments should be involved. ‘ So, the Supreme Court (decision of the 13.01. 2000) assumes that INVESTMENT is required reading for the above persons: ‘the investment advisors, bankers, as well as the investment intermediaries with special trust relationship with its customers, investors, must reveal without being asked and unasked necessarily all reports in INVESTMENT compared to its clients, the investors or investors’ experts comment on the relevant legislation. The Supreme Court expected by the investment adviser, that he the prospectus documents checked gaps and inner consistency.’ In addition, there is the obligation constantly to evaluate INVESTMENT as trade publication. The investment advisor must themselves by hand to obtain the relevant information. A consultant and broker violates his duty of care, shall be liable to 10 years for violations of the Erkundigungs – or disclosure. It involves constant case law, as demonstrated by numerous decisions (see e.g. BGH by 6.7.1995, 17.10.1989, OLG Thuringia 29.10.1997, OLG Munich 19.06.1996, OLG Dusseldorf 30.03.1995, (6.6.1992)) Our benchmark analysis summa arises a very good assessment summary.

Comments are closed.